Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

validateIdToken fails on new version #171

Open
shaun-pendrigh opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

validateIdToken fails on new version #171

shaun-pendrigh opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@shaun-pendrigh
Copy link

shaun-pendrigh commented Apr 9, 2024

Since upgrading from 4.0.0 to 4.1.2, validateIdToken fails with the following message:

SyntaxError: Unexpected token u in JSON at position 0
    at JSON.parse (<anonymous>)
    at C:\Users\SPendrigh\Documents\Development\Officejs\sample\node_modules\intuit-oauth\src\OAuthClient.js:479:33
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at async C:\Users\SPendrigh\Documents\Development\Officejs\sample\app.js:78:7
    at async C:\Users\SPendrigh\Documents\Development\Officejs\sample\app.js:73:3 {
  error: 'Unexpected token u in JSON at position 0',
  authResponse: '',
  intuit_tid: '',
  originalMessage: 'Unexpected token u in JSON at position 0',
  error_description: ''

I modified the sample program to add the OAuthClient.scopes.OpenId, OAuthClient.scopes.Profile, OAuthClient.scopes.Email scopes and added a call to validateIdToken after the createToken call and recreated the error.

I then forced the intuit-oauth version back to 4.0.0 and ran it again and it worked as expected, confirming it is an issue in the new version.

@rajeshgupta723
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @shaun-pendrigh Thanks, will look into the issue. In the meantime, please feel free to raise a PR for the fix.

rajeshgupta723 pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
@rajeshgupta723
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @shaun-pendrigh Created a new branch release-4.1.3 and this PR: #174 to fix the issue. Please test your use case in this new branch. If all looks good, will merge this PR into master and will release this change. Thanks.

@shaun-pendrigh
Copy link
Author

Thanks @rajeshgupta723, will do asap

@shaun-pendrigh
Copy link
Author

Hi @rajeshgupta723. The problem does not seem to be resolved. The getKeyFromJWKsURI is still having an error. I have tried to unpack the logic and understand what is going on in order to assist, but I am certainly not an expert in this. I eventually managed to log the response as it is coming back in version 4.0.0 as well as the new 4.1.3 branch.

In version 4.0.0 the response was in the "body" property and it was a valid json string. In the new version 4.1.3 there is no json property, it is undefined. The keys that the response needs are in the "data" property but it does not seem to be in the same json string format as before. So I am unsure of how to process that "data" property in order to pass correctly as an array of keys.

I don't know enough about Axios to understand the response formats. But hopefully what I have found will help you to know the answer.

Version4.0.0 response.log
Version4.1.3 response.log

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants