Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Discussion (security notes): update the Protocol Labs operated gateways statement. #292

Open
akhileshthite opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Discussion (security notes): update the Protocol Labs operated gateways statement. #292

akhileshthite opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours exp/beginner Can be confidently tackled by newcomers good first issue Good issue for new contributors help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature need/community-input Needs input from the wider community P3 Low: Not priority right now topic/design-front-end Front-end implementation of UX/UI work topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design topic/docs Documentation

Comments

@akhileshthite
Copy link

nftstorage.link and w3s.link gateways are also part of the Protocol Labs right?

Screenshot 2022-09-08 at 4 21 14 PM
@akhileshthite akhileshthite added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label Sep 8, 2022
@welcome

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Jan 18, 2023

How about instead we remove the Protocol Labs line and add an optional column for a link on where someone can learn more about that particular gateway project. (This can be community driven for getting the data filled in.)

@akhileshthite
Copy link
Author

How about instead we remove the Protocol Labs line and add an optional column for a link on where someone can learn more about that particular gateway project. (This can be community driven for getting the data filled in.)

Okay :D

@whizzzkid
Copy link
Contributor

@juliaxbow @SgtPooki maybe this line can be removed and in the redesign we can add an additional column Operated By which links to the privacy policy/contact info provided by the gateway owner?

@whizzzkid whizzzkid added kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue good first issue Good issue for new contributors kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase P3 Low: Not priority right now exp/beginner Can be confidently tackled by newcomers effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours topic/design-front-end Front-end implementation of UX/UI work topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design need/community-input Needs input from the wider community topic/docs Documentation and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Jan 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
effort/hours Estimated to take one or several hours exp/beginner Can be confidently tackled by newcomers good first issue Good issue for new contributors help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature need/community-input Needs input from the wider community P3 Low: Not priority right now topic/design-front-end Front-end implementation of UX/UI work topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design topic/docs Documentation
Projects
No open projects
IPFS-GUI (PL EngRes)
Status: Needs Grooming
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@BigLep @whizzzkid @akhileshthite