We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It doesn't appear possible to have multiple ConstructorMappers registered with the same type, even if they have different prefixes.
@RegisterConstructorMapper(value = Example.class) @RegisterConstructorMapper(value = ExampleSub.class, prefix = "first") @RegisterConstructorMapper(value = ExampleSub.class, prefix = "second") @SqlQuery(""" ... """) @UseRowReducer(ExampleReducer.class) Example findById(@Bind("id") int id);
Within the Reducer the RowView only has the second constructor mapper of the ExampleSub class with the prefix "second" in the example.
Is this intended expected behaviour or a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think this is intentionally not supported, but neither has it been tested to work. We'd love to add this feature.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
It doesn't appear possible to have multiple ConstructorMappers registered with the same type, even if they have different prefixes.
Within the Reducer the RowView only has the second constructor mapper of the ExampleSub class with the prefix "second" in the example.
Is this
intendedexpected behaviour or a bug?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: