CSP violation in isemail

[dominics]

I wonder if you might consider merging a patch like lann/isemail@master...patch-1 ahead of upstream? Seems pretty safe to me, and it would let me turn unsafe-eval off in my CSP policy. 🎉

(Last activity on the upstream PR was December)

[jeffbski]

I'd prefer to see if we can get this merged into isemail so we don't stray from the main codeline, that could quickly become a maintenance nightmare.

I just posted a comment on the PR in isemail to see if we could get this merged. I think it just got forgotten about, so we need to awakend the discussion.

[jeffbski]

It looks like it is merged into isemail@master and should land in isemail@2.2.0 so hopefully once it does then joi and joi-browser can pick it up.

skeggse/isemail#12

[idolizesc]

This was fixed, right?

[jeffbski]

@idolizesc I believe it was, so I have built the latest versions of joi-browser so it should pull in that fix.