-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Infisical Plugin #3924
Comments
Hello from your friendly Jenkins Hosting Checker It appears you have some issues with your hosting request. Please see the list below and correct all issues marked Required. Your hosting request will not be approved until these issues are corrected. Issues marked with Warning or Info are just recommendations and will not stall the hosting process.
You can re-trigger a check by editing your hosting request or by commenting |
Security audit, information and commands The security team is auditing all the hosting requests, to ensure a better security by default. This message informs you that a Jenkins Security Scan was triggered on your repository. CommandsThe bot will parse all comments, and it will check if any line start with a command. Security team only:
Anyone:
Only one command can be requested per comment. (automatically generated message, version: 1.28.4) |
The Jenkins Security Scan discovered 5 finding(s) 🔍. Please follow the instructions below for every identified issues:
After addressing the findings through one of the above methods:
Jenkins: Missing permission check on a form fill web method with credentials lookupYou can find detailed information about this finding here. InfisicalConfiguration.java#140
Stapler: Missing POST/RequirePOST annotationYou can find detailed information about this finding here. InfisicalConfiguration.java#140
Stapler: Missing permission checkYou can find detailed information about this finding here. InfisicalConfiguration.java#140
Jenkins: Plaintext password storageYou can find detailed information about this finding here. InfisicalSecretValue.java#17
SingleSecretResponse.java#7
|
/hosting re-check |
Hello from your friendly Jenkins Hosting Checker It appears you have some issues with your hosting request. Please see the list below and correct all issues marked Required. Your hosting request will not be approved until these issues are corrected. Issues marked with Warning or Info are just recommendations and will not stall the hosting process.
You can re-trigger a check by editing your hosting request or by commenting |
/hosting re-check |
Hello from your friendly Jenkins Hosting Checker It looks like you have everything in order for your hosting request. A member of the Jenkins hosting team will check over things that I am not able to check(code review, README content, etc) and process the request as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience. Hosting team members can host this request with |
/audit-review |
/request-security-scan |
The Jenkins Security Scan did not find anything dangerous with your plugin, congratulations! 🎉 💡 The Security team recommends that you are setting up the scan in your repository by following our guide. |
|
Why a separate plugin? It is much more common to have the things for freestyle and pipeline in the same plugin. And wouldn't it be enough to give your buildwrapper and InfisicalSecret a |
Hi @mawinter69, thanks for the clarification. After taking a second look at the docs I totally agree that it would be senseless to create a separate plugin for pipeline support. I've updated the repo to support pipelines! |
@mawinter69 Just following up, did you get to take a look after my update from 2 days ago? |
one comment, maybe change the symbol from Also if I need to configure infisical in each pipeline, that will cause a lot of duplicate work. Isn't it likely that almost all pipelines will use the same configuration and just need different secrets? So it might be good to provide one or more central configurations that can be reused. And as it looks as if infisical is providing credentials, I wonder if there is a way to say something like
Just proposal I'm not using infisical (and most likely will never use it) |
Hi @mawinter69, I've updated the In regards to the config, it's likely that the environment slug and project slug are unique on a per-job basis. |
Hi again @mawinter69, we're looking to get this done as soon as possible (ideally Monday in the coming week). If you could please let us know how we can proceed that would be great! |
I think you have everything to release for now. My suggestions can also be delivered later. |
@mawinter69 Awesome! Please let me know when everything is set up, and I’ll get started with the release:-) |
Hi @NotMyFault, thank you for the feedback! I've implemented all your feedback in the repo. I have one question/need for clarification:
https://github.com/Infisical/infisical-jenkins/commit/de68abd6e4fc7f0898fb8c7a987371f8ac8d1d67 In the commit above I've updated the version as requested. Does it need to be an exact match? Or is it fine to end it with |
The .x is actually part of the artifact name, but the version itself should match your jenkins.version specified :) |
/hosting host |
Hosting request complete, the code has been forked into the jenkinsci project on GitHub as https://github.com/jenkinsci/infisical-plugin A Jira component named [infisical-plugin](https://issues.jenkins.io/issues/?jql=project+%3D+JENKINS+AND+component+%3D+ infisical-plugin)has also been created with danielhougaard as the default assignee for issues. A pull request has been created against the repository permissions updater to setup release permissions. Additional users can be added by modifying the created file. Please delete your original repository (if there are no other forks), under 'Danger Zone', so that the jenkinsci organization repository is the definitive source for the code. If there are other forks, please contact GitHub support to make the jenkinsci repo the root of the fork network (mention that Jenkins approval was given in support request 569994). Also, please make sure you properly follow the documentation on documenting your plugin so that your plugin is correctly documented. You will also need to do the following in order to push changes and release your plugin:
Welcome aboard! |
Repository URL
https://github.com/Infisical/infisical-jenkins
New Repository Name
infisical-plugin
Description
The Infisical Plugin is a native integration that links Infisical with Jenkins, without the need to use our CLI tool as a part of the freestyle Jenkins project.
The plugin pulls in secret values from Infisical and sets environment variables that can be used in the build step(s). The secret values are masked from the output.
The plugin takes use of Credentials to securely store the Infisical authentication credentials.
GitHub users to have commit permission
@DanielHougaard
@maidul98
@dangtony98
@vmatsiiako
@akhilmhdh
Jenkins project users to have release permission
danielhougaard
Issue tracker
Jira
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: