Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New maintainers #83

Open
garygreen opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

New maintainers #83

garygreen opened this issue Mar 7, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@garygreen
Copy link

@jenssegers It seems the last commit was made over 2 years ago. This library is fairly well used and starred and has some outstanding issues with PR requests.

Is there any plans to bring in new maintainers, or should the library be marked as officially abandoned?

It would be great to have some guidance on what your plans, so the community knows whether to fork or not.

image

@mferrara
Copy link

mferrara commented Mar 9, 2023

@garygreen - you happen to be from the SSEC community?

@jenssegers - seeing the most recent merge of the bigint PR, nice to see you back! Can you take a look at also pulling in the updated PerceptialHash PR? I've been using and testing it without issue. - This is the particular fork I've been using (https://github.com/mferrara/imagehash/commits/master) with good results.

@jenssegers
Copy link
Owner

I guess you are referring to this PR #58?

From the PR, it was unclear how finished this proposal was. I personally have never managed to get the regular perceptual hash algorithm working properly, so it would also be difficult for me to validate this proposal by myself.

@mferrara
Copy link

mferrara commented Mar 15, 2024

+1 year of no activity, can we get some additional maintainers?

... so it would also be difficult for me to validate this proposal by myself.

Seems like a good justification for additional maintainers?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants