Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(expect-expect): support MemberExpressions in assertFunctionNames #176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2018

Conversation

macklinu
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #175

@@ -1,23 +1,7 @@
'use strict';

const getDocsUrl = require('./util').getDocsUrl;

function getName(node) {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I replaced the implementation of util/getNodeName with this implementation, which I think handles member expressions a little bit better than the expect-expect implementation.

All tests continue to pass with the refactor too. 👍

if (index !== -1) {
unchecked.splice(index, 1);
break;
CallExpression(node) {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using the selector query syntax became a little confusing now having to support MemberExpressions, so all CallExpression logic lives in this visitor function now. 😃

@macklinu macklinu force-pushed the fix/expect-expect-call-expression branch from 766272d to 2bb78f1 Compare October 13, 2018 23:18
@macklinu macklinu requested a review from SimenB October 13, 2018 23:18
@SimenB SimenB merged commit 9466959 into master Oct 14, 2018
@SimenB SimenB deleted the fix/expect-expect-call-expression branch October 14, 2018 10:42
@SimenB
Copy link
Member

SimenB commented Oct 14, 2018

🎉 This PR is included in version 21.24.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants