Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nice work on this project! #1

Open
chyld opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

nice work on this project! #1

chyld opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@chyld
Copy link

chyld commented Feb 29, 2024

thanks for making this.

@filcuk
Copy link

filcuk commented Feb 29, 2024

May I ask for some notable differences between this and FitTrackee?
The one thing off the bat is this is very easy to spin up.

Looks really good.

@jovandeginste
Copy link
Owner

jovandeginste commented Feb 29, 2024

May I ask for some notable differences between this and FitTrackee? The one thing off the bat is this is very easy to spin up.

Looks really good.

This is written in Go (vs Python), and has no Javascript framework to speak of. It does use a number of Javascript libraries.
FitTrackee consists of two containers (frontend vs backend), while this is a single binary (packaged in a container if you want that).
FitTrackee only allows to upload one file at a time, or a single zip file containing at most 10 GPX files. This allows a virtual unlimited amount of files to be uploaded; I tested with over 100 files: it takes a while to process, but eventually they're all there.

@ThmsP
Copy link

ThmsP commented Mar 16, 2024

thanks for making this.

+1 !
Tested on my local device, it works very fine.
I need to import my almost 10y of gpx files to see how it goes.

jovandeginste pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants