New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Format is not only allowed for string values #187
Comments
On one hand, the wording "[the] format keyword allows for basic semantic validation on certain kinds of string values", does not explicitly imply that it can't also be used with other types of values. On the other hand, the fact that the documentation for It's also true that the only value for Is there a good, real-world example you could point to, of using "format" with another instance type? Maybe the "int32", "int64", etc. example? |
(although note that their |
Thank you--yes, I had seen that posted in another issue but it's good to have here too. |
@benjagm can I work on this? |
@Sanket-0510 Let me check if we can proceed with this one. |
We should either add these changes to #326 or wait until that's merged to work on this. |
@Sanket-0510 #326 is now merged. You can work on this. Thanks! |
@Sanket-0510 still interested in this issue? |
yes |
Please go ahead @Sanket-0510 with the usage of the tags described here as used in #326. |
Hey @Sanket-0510, |
Hey @lalitkumawat1m Would love to collaborate on this with you, lets take this issue up together and collaborate? |
Hey @Kavisha4 I will definitely do collaborate with you. If @benjagm allows because this issue is already assigned to @Sanket-0510. I'm not sure does he working on this or not. |
Hey @lalitkumawat1m feel free to take this issue, I have not started to work on this yet. |
@lalitkumawat1m please go ahead. See this previous comment please. |
Hey @benjagm I would be collaborating with @lalitkumawat1m on this |
@lalitkumawat1m are you still working on this issue? |
No, I'm not working on this issue. |
Thanks Lalit. I am leaving this issue available for other contributors as there has been no progress in weeks. |
Hey There @benjagm. Could I take this issue up? If it's still available? |
Thanks @bhavukkalra . Please go ahead! |
At https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/string.html#format it says:
As discussed in issue json-schema-org/json-schema-spec#759, format is also defined for non-string types. Therefore, the description should be made more general and moved to another place as it doesn't really fit where it is now. I guess it's better placed at the end of https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/type.html or so...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: