function-component-definition should only test PascalCase identifiers

[wmertens]

function meep(props) {
  return <Meep />
}

Should not be changed by function-component-definition.

[ljharb]

While this is true, why would you have a function like this in the first place, that takes props and returns jsx and isn't named PascalCased?

[wmertens]

This would be a render function, which is passed to a component and gets called as part of the render phase

[ljharb]

Render functions don't take props.

[wmertens]

They might, and in #2771 the examples actually do

[ljharb]

They take arguments - props are only taken by elements/components.

[wmertens]

...ok, but they are indistinguishable in code?

function Foo({bar}) { return <span>{bar}</span/> }
function renderFoo({bar}) { return <span>{bar}</span/> }

[ljharb]

Nope :-) but conceptually they're distinct, and you named your argument "props" which is a signal that it's a component, as is, taking a single destructured object argument - render props usually take multiple flat arguments.

[ljharb]

This seems answered; if not, we can reopen.