You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, hope this finds you well. We're using this library and are happy with its performance in general
We have our own memory pool that we would like to use in the library as managing the memory ourselves is something really important for us. So is implementing some classes so they can accept a custom pool something you are considering or open to do anytime soon?
What are your general thoughts about that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
what do you mean with "own memory pool"? Something like an STL allocator?
Do you care only about the instrumented code? That one that increments the Counters, Gauges, and Histograms? Usually, once set-up with all required labels it should not allocate at all.
The collecting side is run from a different thread and there runtime usually is not too critical.
Yes we mean an allocator that you can use as an STL allocators. But we would like to use it if possible for any new calls. If that isn't feasible to do this for all allocations, targeting the memory that is long lived is more important as our server runs for a very long time. Short duration allocations are fine to skip.
Hello, hope this finds you well. We're using this library and are happy with its performance in general
We have our own memory pool that we would like to use in the library as managing the memory ourselves is something really important for us. So is implementing some classes so they can accept a custom pool something you are considering or open to do anytime soon?
What are your general thoughts about that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: