Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added debug messages #6704

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 31, 2019
Merged

Added debug messages #6704

merged 3 commits into from Jul 31, 2019

Conversation

JohanMabille
Copy link
Member

References

This PR partially implements changes described in jupyter/jupyter_client#446.
It completes #6544 and allows to send debug_request messages on the Control channel.

This PR should not be merged until the Jupyter Kernel Protocol has been updated as described in jupyter/jupyter_client#446.

Code changes

  • Adds interface for messages sent on the Control channel, as well as new message types for debugging.
  • A new method has been added in the default kernel implementation (requestDebug)

User-facing changes

None

Backwards-incompatible changes

None

@jupyterlab-dev-mode
Copy link

Thanks for making a pull request to JupyterLab!

To try out this branch on binder, follow this link: Binder

@afshin
Copy link
Member

afshin commented Jul 30, 2019

This looks good to me, modulo the docstrings about API stability @jasongrout raised.

Is using a @deprecated tag appropriate?

@jasongrout jasongrout self-requested a review July 31, 2019 01:09
@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor

Is using a @deprecated tag appropriate?

I think @hidden is better from this list in typedoc: https://typedoc.org/guides/doccomments/

Copy link
Contributor

@jasongrout jasongrout left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added docstrings everywhere warning that these things are experimental.

Can someone review my docstrings? @SylvainCorlay, @afshin, @JohanMabille, etc.?

@jasongrout jasongrout added this to the 1.1 milestone Jul 31, 2019
@SylvainCorlay
Copy link
Member

This looks good to me!

@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor

@afshin - feel free to merge if it also looks good to you. I'll merge tomorrow morning (~8 hours) if you haven't and there are no objections.

@SylvainCorlay SylvainCorlay self-requested a review July 31, 2019 09:46
@afshin
Copy link
Member

afshin commented Jul 31, 2019

Sweet, thank you!

@SylvainCorlay
Copy link
Member

🎉

@JohanMabille
Copy link
Member Author

Awesome!

@JohanMabille JohanMabille deleted the debug branch July 31, 2019 16:52
@lock lock bot added the status:resolved-locked Closed issues are locked after 30 days inactivity. Please open a new issue for related discussion. label Aug 30, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 30, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status:resolved-locked Closed issues are locked after 30 days inactivity. Please open a new issue for related discussion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants