Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

es2022 support #76

Open
3 of 4 tasks
aladdin-add opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 10 comments
Open
3 of 4 tasks

es2022 support #76

aladdin-add opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 10 comments

Comments

@aladdin-add
Copy link
Collaborator

aladdin-add commented May 27, 2021

  • class fields
  • top-level await
  • regexp-match-indices
  • private-fields-in-in(#x in obj)
@KFlash
Copy link
Contributor

KFlash commented May 27, 2021

@aladdin-add top-level-await is all about performance. I'm afraid of perf regression.
Maybe you should try to parse class fields with Kataw? It's already implemented.

@aladdin-add
Copy link
Collaborator Author

we have to implement it - it will be a part of ECMA 262.

@KFlash
Copy link
Contributor

KFlash commented May 27, 2021

I think this can be closed? See #77

@aladdin-add
Copy link
Collaborator Author

or keep it open to track the following es2022 features (as it was not fully finalized)?

@KFlash
Copy link
Contributor

KFlash commented May 27, 2021

What kind of es2022 features is missing?

@aladdin-add
Copy link
Collaborator Author

it depends. es2022 will be published in the next year, so it's very likely to have more features added in the rest of the year.

@aladdin-add
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FYI: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-regexp-match-indices has reached stage-4. updated the OP.

@KFlash
Copy link
Contributor

KFlash commented Jun 14, 2021

I know :) You can mark it as done. The d flag is recognized already.

@aladdin-add
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FYI: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-private-fields-in-in has reached stage-4. updated the OP.

@KFlash
Copy link
Contributor

KFlash commented Jul 29, 2021

I know this, but not sure about the implementation. However I implemented it, but should it go through BinaryExpression?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants