Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding the explanation for which configuration takes preference over the other in Default Broker Config #5856

Open
Leo6Leo opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Adding the explanation for which configuration takes preference over the other in Default Broker Config #5856

Leo6Leo opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Member

Leo6Leo commented Feb 9, 2024

What is changing? (Please include as many details as possible.)

Adding the explanation for which configuration takes preference over the other in Default Broker Config

  1. Broker class based defaults eventing#7631

Additional info

This issue is on hold until the PR above is merged.
@Leo6Leo Leo6Leo mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2024
Open
5 tasks
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 10, 2024
@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Member Author

Leo6Leo commented May 13, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Leo6Leo