Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify the format of request.headers #1325

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2019
Merged

Conversation

dobesv
Copy link
Contributor

@dobesv dobesv commented Apr 23, 2019

I spent a few minutes trying to figure out what format the headers were being provided in, perhaps this will save some time for anyone else (or my future self) who forgets the details of how header names are lower-cased and how multiple headers with the same name are combined, etc..

I spent a few minutes trying to figure out what format the headers were being provided in, perhaps this will save some time for anyone else (or my future self) who forgets the details of how header names are lower-cased and how multiple headers with the same name are combined, etc..
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1325 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1325   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files           5       5           
  Lines         393     393           
======================================
  Hits          393     393

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 75233d9...1ecc7a6. Read the comment docs.

@dead-horse dead-horse merged commit 132c9ee into koajs:master Jun 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants