Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[proposal] more UT is needed for yarn node syncer in yarn-operator #52

Open
zwzhang0107 opened this issue Nov 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[proposal] more UT is needed for yarn node syncer in yarn-operator #52

zwzhang0107 opened this issue Nov 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
area/yarn-operator good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone
release-v0.2

Comments

@zwzhang0107
Copy link
Collaborator

What is your proposal:

Why is this needed:

Is there a suggested solution, if so, please add it:
@zwzhang0107 zwzhang0107 added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed area/yarn-operator labels Nov 15, 2023
@zwzhang0107 zwzhang0107 changed the title [proposal] more ut is need for yarn node syncer in yarn-operator [proposal] more ut is needed for yarn node syncer in yarn-operator Nov 15, 2023
@zwzhang0107 zwzhang0107 changed the title [proposal] more ut is needed for yarn node syncer in yarn-operator [proposal] more UT is needed for yarn node syncer in yarn-operator Nov 15, 2023
@zwzhang0107 zwzhang0107 added this to the release-v0.2 milestone Nov 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/yarn-operator good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
release-v0.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@zwzhang0107