Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace timeout + timeUnit with Duration #30

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 15, 2016
Merged

Replace timeout + timeUnit with Duration #30

merged 2 commits into from Jun 15, 2016

Conversation

helmbold
Copy link
Contributor

@helmbold helmbold commented Jun 15, 2016

@sksamuel sksamuel merged commit 259f157 into kotest:master Jun 15, 2016
@sksamuel
Copy link
Member

Awesome. I might change the release version to 1.3 rather than 2.0 as that's still a major version. I know that's not strictly semver but it seems to be what most JVM projects do, eg Scala, Spark, Akka etc. What do you think?

@helmbold
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think that many projects don't use versioning properly. The version numbers lose there expressiveness. And today version numbers are actually pretty cheap ;-) Let's follow semantic versioning.

Have you noticed that the build fails? I try to fix it (what is not optimal without beeing able to compile it under windows).

@sksamuel
Copy link
Member

Yes I noticed, I will attempt a fix in a minute. I'm on windows atm and
need to reboot into linux.

On 15 June 2016 at 20:43, Christian Helmbold notifications@github.com
wrote:

I think that many projects don't use versioning properly. The version
numbers lose there expressiveness. And today version numbers are actually
pretty cheap ;-) Let's follow semantic versioning.

Have you noticed that the build fails? I try to fix it (what is not
optimal without beeing able to compile it under windows).


You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#30 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAtZGhiGVuzadUBkPV9hXMR5MvJeFtx5ks5qMFXHgaJpZM4I2tVR
.

@helmbold
Copy link
Contributor Author

helmbold commented Jun 15, 2016

I tried to fix it and created another pull request. #31 I'm in blind flight mode without a compiler ;-)

@sksamuel
Copy link
Member

Can't merge it - conflicts.

On 15 June 2016 at 20:56, Christian Helmbold notifications@github.com
wrote:

I tried to fix it and created another pull request. #31
#31


You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#30 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAtZGleei7QIUHKc-gjl24ltWl0v2nIYks5qMFj3gaJpZM4I2tVR
.

sksamuel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2016
* replace timeout and timeoutUnit with duration

* add changelog
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2024
provide more details when `shouldExistInOrder` fails. For instance,
print out "Predicate number 1 did not match", as shown in the following
example:
```
        "fail with clear message" {
             shouldThrowAny {
                listOf(1, 2).shouldExistInOrder(
                   { i: Int -> i < 2 },
                   { i: Int -> i < 2 }
                )
             }.message shouldBe "[1, 2] did not match the predicates [(kotlin.Int) -> kotlin.Boolean, (kotlin.Int) -> kotlin.Boolean] in order. Predicate at index 1 did not match."
          }
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Emil Kantis <emil.kantis@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants