New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gradle issue #8
Comments
sksamuel
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2016
ajalt
referenced
this issue
in ajalt/kotlintest
Jul 13, 2018
The current string shrink algorithm generates candidates by dropping single characters from the end of the input. This doesn't produce the smallest case, since it doesn't drop characters from the start of the string. It is also linear on the size of the input, so it requires a potentially large number of tries to reach the result it does produce. This PR changes to algorithm to bisect the input string from both directions, producing a minimal output in log n tries. As an example of the current behavior, the test: `forAll { it: String -> !it.contains("#") }` produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7jw{ Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7 fail Shrink #3: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ fail Shrink #4: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) fail Shrink #5: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQx fail Shrink #6: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k fail Shrink #7: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x, fail Shrink #8: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B* fail Shrink #9: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn fail Shrink #10: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2 fail Shrink #11: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# fail Shrink #12: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #13: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #14: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #15: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #16: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink #17: aaaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #18: aaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #19: aaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #20: aaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #21: aDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink result => DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# ``` This is 21 attempts to produce a string 32x longer than optimal. The new algorithm produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9#F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9 pass Shrink #3: #F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx fail Shrink #4: #F'>g>vG fail Shrink #5: #F'> fail Shrink #6: #F fail Shrink #7: # fail Shrink result => # ``` This is only 7 tries, and produces the correct output of `"#"`
sksamuel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2018
The current string shrink algorithm generates candidates by dropping single characters from the end of the input. This doesn't produce the smallest case, since it doesn't drop characters from the start of the string. It is also linear on the size of the input, so it requires a potentially large number of tries to reach the result it does produce. This PR changes to algorithm to bisect the input string from both directions, producing a minimal output in log n tries. As an example of the current behavior, the test: `forAll { it: String -> !it.contains("#") }` produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7jw{ Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ tri7 fail Shrink #3: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) e|Gr+ fail Shrink #4: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQxU+!) fail Shrink #5: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k<}QQx fail Shrink #6: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x,L;6&k fail Shrink #7: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B*w,1x, fail Shrink #8: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn18+B* fail Shrink #9: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2yEcNn fail Shrink #10: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M#EC\M2 fail Shrink #11: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# fail Shrink #12: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #13: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #14: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #15: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #16: DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink #17: aaaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$ pass Shrink #18: aaaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$F pass Shrink #19: aaaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz pass Shrink #20: aaDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz; pass Shrink #21: aDPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M pass Shrink result => DPn CPQ7hBAY&LP;7MxPtN^Oy\$Fz;M# ``` This is 21 attempts to produce a string 32x longer than optimal. The new algorithm produces output like this: ``` Attempting to shrink failed arg t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9#F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx Shrink #1: <empty string> pass Shrink #2: t ^j>t\o,x3?eb9 pass Shrink #3: #F'>g>vGQ-N}nkx fail Shrink #4: #F'>g>vG fail Shrink #5: #F'> fail Shrink #6: #F fail Shrink #7: # fail Shrink result => # ``` This is only 7 tries, and produces the correct output of `"#"`
sksamuel
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
im just trying it out in a gradle project.
in intellij everything is fine, but when running gradle test it does not work.
eg this test passes in gradle but fails in IJ
test result output is
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: