Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Add test for scale testing machinery #9510

Merged

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

A test to ensure the scale test is running before adding to periodic.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Sep 29, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 29, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon: The /test command needs one or more targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-dualstack-and-ipv6-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-28-latest-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-scale-main-experimental

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • pull-cluster-api-verify-main

In response to this:

/test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-scale-main-experimental

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 29, 2023
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title [DNR] 🌱 Test scale run 🌱 Add test for scale testing machinery Sep 29, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/area e2e-testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Sep 29, 2023
@@ -24,7 +24,26 @@ import (
"k8s.io/utils/pointer"
)

var _ = Describe("When scale testing using in-memory provider [Scale]", func() {
var _ = Describe("When testing the machinery for scale testing using in-memory provider", func() {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a duplicate in terms of spec, but the point is to have a test with no tag so we're testing e2e for the in-memory provider to ensure it's up and running.

This test should run as part of e2e-full while leaving the [Scale] tag for future work around scale testing.

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabriziopandini - seeing as you had the idea originally @https://vmware.slack.com/archives/C0523T5H7MF/p1694765812754249

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 29, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: a126e0a46167d3b87591efd0bc90a3c28b3301c5

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: killianmuldoon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ac96b94 into kubernetes-sigs:main Oct 2, 2023
28 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.6 milestone Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants