Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃摉 Add Cluster API release-1.7 timeline document #9635

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

furkatgofurov7
Copy link
Member

@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 commented Oct 30, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds release-1.7 cycle schedule document with preliminary dates taking into account Kubecon Europe 2024 between March 19-22, 2024 on week 16th in the schedule.

Part of: #9094

/area release
/kind documentation

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/release Issues or PRs related to releasing kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Oct 30, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 30, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good - just one comment on scheduling.

docs/release/releases/release-1.7.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me pending squash

Signed-off-by: Furkat Gofurov <furkat.gofurov@suse.com>
@furkatgofurov7
Copy link
Member Author

cc @kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-maintainers FYI

@furkatgofurov7
Copy link
Member Author

Looks good to me pending squash

Done.

@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2023
29 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM aside from code freeze comment

docs/release/releases/release-1.7.md Show resolved Hide resolved
| *v1.5.x & v1.6.x released* | Release Lead | Tuesday 5th March 2024 | week 14 |
| v1.7.0-beta.x released | Release Lead | Tuesday 12th March 2024 | week 15 |
| KubeCon idle week | - | 19th - 22nd March 2024 | week 16 |
| release-1.7 branch created (**Begin [Code Freeze]**) | Release Lead | Tuesday 26th March 2024 | week 17 |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit concerned with the code freeze date falling right after kubecon, where maintainers/reviewers will come back after a week away to an inbox full of notifications and there will a lot of last minute PRs that want to get in before code freeze... Not sure if there is another way

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're doing something similar for this current release with Kubecon NA so we can see how that works out I guess?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CecileRobertMichon that is right, it is the same for the current release cycle and this was kind of discussed when adding v1.6 timeline doc: #8901 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think my point is that if this current release cycle doesn't work out well with the code freeze right after kubecon we should consider amending the timeline for 1.7, but we won't know until after we do the code freeze for 1.6.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed in today's (1/11/23) office hours and pointed out by @CecileRobertMichon, we will see how it works out with the current release cycle and decide based on that for the 1.7 release.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wanted to add that there's also the easter weekend ~ from 29 March - 1 April

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But looks like we already have a 19 weeks cycle, we probably shouldn't extend this further otherwise the other two release cycles will become even shorter in 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 60707e07c1b15fb905c0c7fd7ad739b7466c0d59

@CecileRobertMichon
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CecileRobertMichon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 1, 2023
@CecileRobertMichon
Copy link
Contributor

CecileRobertMichon commented Nov 1, 2023

/hold let's leave this open until EOD?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 1, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f68b462 into kubernetes-sigs:main Nov 6, 2023
25 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.6 milestone Nov 6, 2023
@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 deleted the release-1-7-team branch November 6, 2023 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release Issues or PRs related to releasing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants