Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 client.List should check on UnstructuredList, not Unstructured #1287

Merged

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri commented Dec 3, 2020

After adding the metadata only watch and client support, the List object
was type checking on Unstructured instead of UnstructuredList.

Now! "Why were the tests passing??" one might ask, it seems that even
though our tests had some using UnstructuredLists and querying against
List, the objects we were asking (appsv1/Deployments) are core objects
that are usually included in the default client-go scheme.Scheme.

For the above reason, the internal typedClient was able to make the
request to the API server and convert the list of object back to
UnstructuredList.

/milestone v0.6.x
/assign @alvaroaleman @DirectXMan12

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.6.x milestone Dec 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 3, 2020
Copy link
Member

@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alvaroaleman,vincepri]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

After adding the metadata only watch and client support, the List object
was type checking on `Unstructured` instead of `UnstructuredList`.

Now! "Why were the tests passing??" one might ask, it seems that even
though our tests had some using UnstructuredLists and querying against
List, the objects we were asking (appsv1/Deployments) are core objects
that are usually included in the default client-go scheme.Scheme.

For the above reason, the internal `typedClient` was able to make the
request to the API server and convert the list of object back to
UnstructuredList.

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <vincepri@vmware.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member Author

vincepri commented Dec 3, 2020

/retest

@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ef9edab into kubernetes-sigs:release-0.6 Dec 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants