Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Cache bypass should take into account List types #1297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 15, 2020

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Member

Currently, when we create a new delegating client and we force some
types to be uncached, we can only specify client.Object(s).

When these objects are passed to the delegating client, and their GVK is
matched against the internal map, the check doesn't take into account
that the client might be issuing a List call with a ObjectList instead
of a metav1.Object.

The proposed solution is taken from the discovery rest mapper, which
does the same ~hack. While it's not perfect, probably close to all
generated objects are going to have a list that has the "List" suffix,
that when removed gives back the original GVK.

If there are other solutions, happy to change this hack.

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano vincepri@vmware.com

/assign @alvaroaleman

Currently, when we create a new delegating client and we force some
types to be uncached, we can only specify client.Object(s).

When these objects are passed to the delegating client, and their GVK is
matched against the internal map, the check doesn't take into account
that the client might be issuing a List call with a ObjectList instead
of a metav1.Object.

The proposed solution is taken from the discovery rest mapper, which
does the same ~hack. While it's not perfect, probably close to all
generated objects are going to have a list that has the "List" suffix,
that when removed gives back the original GVK.

If there are other solutions, happy to change this hack.

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <vincepri@vmware.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 15, 2020
Copy link
Member

@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alvaroaleman,vincepri]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 355962a into kubernetes-sigs:master Dec 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants