Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Correctly pass cache options on #1743

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 8, 2021

Conversation

alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

There were two bugs in this:

  • The caches BuilderWithOptions defaulted the opts it got from the
    manager with the ones it explicitly got, resulting in new fields
    like DefaultSelector needing to explicitly be added there
  • The caches DefaultSelector wasn't correctly used everywhere, because
    there was code left that directly accessed the gvk -> selector map and
    thus didn't get the default selector. Use a getter func rather than
    the map internally, to make this impossible

/assign @vincepri

There were two bugs in this:
* The caches `BuilderWithOptions` defaulted the opts it got from the
  manager with the ones it explicitly got, resulting in new fields
  like `DefaultSelector` needing to explicitly be added there
* The caches `DefaultSelector` wasn't correctly used everywhere, because
  there was code left that directly accessed the gvk -> selector map and
  thus didn't get the default selector. Use a getter func rather than
  the map internally, to make this impossible
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alvaroaleman,vincepri]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f236f03 into kubernetes-sigs:master Dec 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.10.x milestone Dec 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants