Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 zap-time-encoding test should allow negative tz offset #1856

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 7, 2022

Conversation

JohnStrunk
Copy link
Contributor

The regex used to test whether the times were being properly encoded as ISO8601 only permitted either positive tz offsets or Z. This fix adjusts the regex to also allow negative offsets.

Ref: Wikipedia: ISO 8601 - Time offsets from UTC

Example of failure when running on my local machine:

Zap log level flag options setup
/home/jstrunk/src/controller-runtime/pkg/log/zap/zap_test.go:281
  with zap-time-encoding flag provided
  /home/jstrunk/src/controller-runtime/pkg/log/zap/zap_test.go:487
    Should propagate time encoder to logger [It]
    /home/jstrunk/src/controller-runtime/pkg/log/zap/zap_test.go:529

    Expected
        <string>: 2022-04-05T11:35:03.086-0400
    to match regular expression
        <string>: ^[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}T[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}.[0-9]{3}(\+[0-9]{4}|Z)

    /home/jstrunk/src/controller-runtime/pkg/log/zap/zap_test.go:546

The regex used to test whether the times were being properly encoded as
ISO8601 only permitted either positive tz offsets or Z. This fix adjusts
the regex to also allow negative offsets.

Signed-off-by: John Strunk <jstrunk@redhat.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 5, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @JohnStrunk!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 5, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @JohnStrunk. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 5, 2022
Copy link
Member

@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, JohnStrunk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 7, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 188b486 into kubernetes-sigs:master Apr 7, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.10.x milestone Apr 7, 2022
@JohnStrunk JohnStrunk deleted the fix-zap-test branch April 7, 2022 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants