Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚠ fake client: use correct RBAC apiGroup name when deciding if to allow unconditional updates #2412

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Aug 4, 2023

Conversation

jaideepr97
Copy link
Contributor

@jaideepr97 jaideepr97 commented Jul 19, 2023

The fake client logic runs through a switch case, switching on resource group to decide if unconditional update should be allowed for a particular resource or not
However, for rbac resources it checks against the string "rbac" as the group name, as opposed to "rbac.authorization.k8s.io", which is the actual group name for rbac resources

This issue currently results in an "object modified" error when the fake client tries to update any rbac resource, as it fails the allowsUnconditionalUpdate check

This PR fixes that by updating the rbac group name to the correct value

Signed-off-by: Jaideep Rao <jaideep.r97@gmail.com>
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jul 19, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @jaideepr97!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 19, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jaideepr97. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 19, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jaideep Rao <jaideep.r97@gmail.com>
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 22, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/retitle ⚠ fake client: use correct RBAC apiGroup name when deciding if to allow unconditional updates

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title 🐛 update fake client rbac group for unconditionalUpdate ⚠ fake client: use correct RBAC apiGroup name when deciding if to allow unconditional updates Jul 28, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jaideep Rao <jaideep.r97@gmail.com>
@jaideepr97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@jaideepr97

Please squash the commits, then we can merge. thx!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 29, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Aug 4, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jaideepr97, sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit dbcf380 into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 4, 2023
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants