Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃悰 Fix lazy rest mapper cache invalidation #2687

Conversation

g-gaston
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes a bug introduced by my previous PR #2663

When a group version is not found, if the group version is cached in apiGroups but not cached in knownGroups, the cache is not invalidated. Moreover and even worse, in that scenario an error is returned.

This is only an issue under the very rare case where a version has been removed during a call just after caching in apiGroups but before it's cached in knownGroups.

After the change now an error is never returned for not found versions no matter if the version was cached or not. And now the two different caches are checked and invalidated independently.

When a group version is not found, if the group version is cached in
apiGroups but not cached in knownGroups, the cache is not invalidated.
Moreover and even worse, in that scenario an error is returned.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 14, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Perfect. Thank you very much!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: g-gaston, sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@g-gaston Do you have some time to open cherry-pick PRs for release-0.17 and release-0.16?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5615941 into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 15, 2024
9 checks passed
@g-gaston
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-0.17

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@g-gaston: new pull request created: #2688

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-0.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants