Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1197: crictl rm to also remove container log files #1367

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

fformica
Copy link
Contributor

@fformica fformica commented Feb 26, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Container log files are not deleted by the runtime, but the user might want to remove them alongside the container.
This PR changes the default behaviour to removing the logs and introduces a new option to the rm command to preserve the container log file and its rotations.
Failing to delete files doesn't fail the command and is only logged.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #1197

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Changed default behaviour in `rm` command to also delete the container's log file.
Added `--keeplogs, -k` option to the `rm` command to preserve logs.

Signed-off-by: Ferdinando Formica <ferdinando.formica@ie.ibm.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Feb 26, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Feb 26, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @fformica!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 26, 2024
@kwilczynski
Copy link
Contributor

@fformica, thank you for taking this on! Appreciated.

However, we can have a different spin on the problem at hand.

Generally, most of the time, users want to get everything (all the created artefacts) removed once the container is deleted, including the log files.

This should be the default behaviour, and it would follow the principle of least surprise here.

Now, the different spin I mentioned, would be now having an option to not delete logs, if requested. This would allow users to preserve log files should these be needed for something.

So we would have crictl rm --keep-logs or perhaps crictl rm --preseve-logs instead here.

What do you think?

@saschagrunert, thoughts?

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

I agree having it the other way around makes more sense. We just have to double check that we do not break anything in CI, and a highlighted release note that this is now the default behavior should be included.

Signed-off-by: Ferdinando Formica <ferdinando.formica@ie.ibm.com>
Changing alias to just k

Co-authored-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@fformica
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the feedback!
Side note, it looks like containerd currently doesn't set logPath, so I'll test that a bit (#1197 was observed on OpenShift).

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

@fformica do we need to change / enhance docs for this?

@fformica
Copy link
Contributor Author

The crictl documentation doesn't explore the options for every command, so I don't think it's necessary to document this separately; I'm not sure though, so let me know if there's anything you think should be updated.

@fformica fformica changed the title 1197: adding rm --dl (--deletelog) option 1197: crictl rm also remove container log files Feb 27, 2024
@fformica fformica changed the title 1197: crictl rm also remove container log files 1197: crictl rm to also remove container log files Feb 27, 2024
} else if !ctx.Bool("keep-logs") {
logPath := resp.GetStatus().GetLogPath()
if logPath != "" {
logRotations, err := filepath.Glob(logPath + "*")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this save for the log rotation? We would also possible remove files which are not rotated logs but other files, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's possible, although the rotations attach to the file name so it's unlikely, e.g. this was from my test with cri-o:

-rw------- 1 root root 5.3M Feb 26 05:49 0.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.2M Feb 26 05:44 0.log.20240226-053352.gz
-rw------- 1 root root  11M Feb 26 05:44 0.log.20240226-054404

Another container would be e.g. 1.log, but a user could have backed up a 0.log.bak, and this code would delete that too. I wasn't sure if the log rotation always follows this format though.
Reading https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/logging/ the rotation in /var/log should only be performed by kubelet, so I could use that as a guide, removing files in this format in that directory and ignoring rotations outside it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like kubelet uses a very similar pattern: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/kubelet/logs/container_log_manager.go#L312
For the time being I'll do the same and just add the missing dot; I'm averse to adding hardcoded references to the dir, especially because it seems a bit more variable under Windows (the doc mentions C:\var\logs and C:\var\log\pods).

Signed-off-by: Ferdinando Formica <ferdinando.formica@ie.ibm.com>
@kwilczynski
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kwilczynski: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/approve
/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Signed-off-by: Ferdinando Formica <ferdinando.formica@ie.ibm.com>
@fformica
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry 😭 I only just noticed that by adding the dot I excluded the current log file...

@kwilczynski
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry 😭 I only just noticed that by adding the dot I excluded the current log file...

No worries. 👍

Might be good to do some manual testing to confirm things work as expected.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 28, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fformica, kwilczynski, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 28, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 17b4dd6 into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 28, 2024
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Critctl doesn't delete container log files after container is deleted
4 participants