Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port forward ignores errOut for some errors #1303

Open
manterfield opened this issue Oct 7, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Port forward ignores errOut for some errors #1303

manterfield opened this issue Oct 7, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@manterfield
Copy link

manterfield commented Oct 7, 2023

This is a potentially a user error, but it's not obvious to me what I could have done differently. When I create a port forward via portforward.New() with appropriate writers for out and errOut there's cases where the errOut is ignored.

Specifically where I get an error like so:

E1007 16:49:40.319613   54503 portforward.go:409] an error occurred forwarding 62307 -> 8999: error forwarding port 8999 to pod SOME_UUID, uid : failed to execute portforward in network namespace "/var/run/netns/cni-SOME_UUID": failed to connect to localhost:8917 inside namespace "SOME_UUID", IPv4: dial tcp4 127.0.0.1:8999: connect: connection timed out IPv6 dial tcp6 [::1]:8999: connect: cannot assign requested address 

The first part an error occurred forwarding appears to come from here

Problem is I'm actually passing a custom writer to errOut, which should ensure all errors are ran through my structured logger (otherwise I get non-json output in the middle of my structured logs, which screws up the parsing of them).


I did find a hacky workaround after attempting to following the code, which is to call:

klog.LogToStderr(false)
klog.SetLogger(logger)

before running portforward.

Ideally I wouldn't introduce these packages into my code, but I couldn't see another way to do it.
The above method has the drawback that I have to depend on klog, go-logr and go-logr/zerologr in addition to my actual logger, zerolog. Those exist purely to prevent one unstructured error log from appearing.

If I've missed a better/cleaner way to do this, I'd love to see an example if possible.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 29, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 28, 2024
@manterfield
Copy link
Author

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants