Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workflow to automatically update schedule.yaml #45762

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert commented Apr 3, 2024

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject label Apr 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from tengqm April 3, 2024 12:38
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 3, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a63678a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/6639d6e30974770008a2540e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-45762--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@saschagrunert saschagrunert force-pushed the update-schedule-yaml branch 2 times, most recently from ce084d6 to 02cc2be Compare April 3, 2024 13:17
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the language/en Issues or PRs related to English language label Apr 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sftim sftim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the PR.

/hold

We're overall wary of having workflows write to GitHub (we'd typically use Prow, but GitHub Actions has gained lots of feature since Prow came into existence).

Let's check that the SIG is happy with this and is confident we can maintain it.

.github/workflows/update-schedule.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/update-schedule.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/update-schedule.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 3, 2024
@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Apr 3, 2024

I wonder if we should address #38431 - Split “can approve English content changes” from “can review general website changes” permissions - first.

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

I'd like to highlight that the new schedule-builder does not handle data/releases/eol.yaml nor updates the "Upcoming Monthly Releases" table. I think we can follow-up on that.

@saschagrunert saschagrunert force-pushed the update-schedule-yaml branch 7 times, most recently from 02cf82c to a91b3c7 Compare April 4, 2024 08:44
.github/workflows/update-schedule.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data/releases/schedule.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
data/releases/schedule.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Apr 15, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Apr 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 22, 2024
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

This PR now contains only the workflow, the other part got already merged.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@xmudrii xmudrii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2024
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

@kubernetes/sig-docs-leads are we okay to move forward with this?

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented May 6, 2024

/lgtm

@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented May 6, 2024

For LGTM on this particular change, let's get it from a SIG tech lead (or a chair acting in their stead). Leaving the existing hold in place.

Noting LGTMs from #45762 (comment) and other reviews.

As an emeritus tech lead:
/lgtm cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from xmudrii May 6, 2024 21:41
.github/workflows/update-schedule.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any CLA issues expected with this workflow?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, we're using the same approach there for example: kubernetes-sigs/downloadkubernetes#630

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, xmudrii
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from sftim. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Automate updating patch releases calendar on the Kubernetes website
5 participants