Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about support matrix for kubernetes-cni package and confusion about its versioning in different repos #3238

Open
haiwu opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.

Comments

@haiwu
Copy link

haiwu commented Aug 31, 2023

What happened:

Where is the support matrix for 'kubernetes-cni' package?

What you expected to happen:

Expect to have some support matrix for this package for different k8s versions.

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):

I could see these deb packages for 'kubernetes-cni' available from both Google-hosted repo and the new repo:

# apt-cache madison kubernetes-cni
kubernetes-cni |  1.2.0-2.1 | https://pkgs.k8s.io/core:/stable:/v1.28/deb  Packages
kubernetes-cni |  1.2.0-2.1 | https://pkgs.k8s.io/core:/stable:/v1.27/deb  Packages
kubernetes-cni |   1.2.0-00 | https://apt.kubernetes.io kubernetes-xenial/main amd64 Packages
kubernetes-cni |  1.1.1-2.1 | https://pkgs.k8s.io/core:/stable:/v1.27/deb  Packages
kubernetes-cni |   1.1.1-00 | https://apt.kubernetes.io kubernetes-xenial/main amd64 Packages
kubernetes-cni |   0.8.7-00 | https://apt.kubernetes.io kubernetes-xenial/main amd64 Packages

But which version of kubernets-cni package are good for which k8s 1.25, 1.26, 1.27?

Some words from https://kubernetes.io/blog/2023/08/15/pkgs-k8s-io-introduction/: Kubernetes repositories for v1.24 to v1.27 have same versions of these packages as the Google-hosted repository.

But as shown above, the Google-hosted repository has 1.1.1-00 version, while the new repo has 1.1.1-2.1 version, not exactly the same. Same thing could be said about 1.2.0-00 in Google-hosted repository, but 1.2.0-2.1 in the new repo.

And any difference between these versions in different repo? This is very confusing. Please clarify.

Anything else we need to know?:

N/A

@haiwu haiwu added area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. labels Aug 31, 2023
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Aug 31, 2023

Hello @haiwu,

The package version has two parts: the version of the component and the package revision, usually separated with -. In this concrete case, 1.1.1-2.1 means that you'll get kubernetes-cni 1.1.1, and that the package revision is 2.1. Package revision is important in case we need to rebuild the package for the same version of the component for any reason.

It's mentioned in the announcement blog post that the package revision format got changed in the new repos:

The revision part of the package version (the -00 part in 1.28.0-00) is now autogenerated by the OpenBuildService platform and has a different format. The revision is now in the format of -x.y, e.g. 1.28.0-1.1

x is number of commits in OBS for the given component version, while y is number of rebuilds of x. Some info about that can be found in the following Slack thread: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03U7N0VCGK/p1691738497514679

Revisions for the RPM packages are following a slightly different format, but we're addressing that as part of #3221

I hope the revision part is more clear now, but if not, please let us know if you have any other questions.

@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Aug 31, 2023

But which version of kubernets-cni package are good for which k8s 1.25, 1.26, 1.27?

I missed this question, but we don't have a formalized compatibility matrix. Most of these releases are requiring at least kubernetes-cni 1.1.1, as can be seen here: https://github.com/kubernetes/release/blob/master/cmd/krel/templates/latest/metadata.yaml

Starting with 1.29, we'll publish only kubernetes-cni versions that were tested with the given Kubernetes minor version, providing a sort of compatibility matrix. We'll also try to document that in some form.

@haiwu
Copy link
Author

haiwu commented Sep 1, 2023

Hi @xmudrii: Thanks for clarifying!

Does this mean that we could just go ahead and use 'kubernetes-cni' package latest version '1.2.0-2.1' for all k8s installations, covering k8s 1.25, 1.26, 1.27 and 1.28? Meaning we could always just go with latest 'kubernetes-cni' for all k8s releases?

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

saschagrunert commented Sep 1, 2023

@haiwu In theory yes, but it also depends on the used container runtime. What we tested can be found in the corresponding release branch via dependencies.yaml:

@xmudrii xmudrii added kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Sep 5, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 27, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.
Projects
Status: 🔖 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants