Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Returns db-connected and code-connected services in REST API dashboard #36

Open
michalbundyra opened this issue Jan 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@michalbundyra
Copy link
Member

When you request GET /dashboard API right now, you get a rest and rpc array with the name of the services. We cannot distinguish between db-connected and code-connected from the rest array. It would be nice to have this distinguish to build a better dashboard UI.
I propose to add an optional parameter to return a more detailed result, such as /dashboard?extended.


Originally posted by @ezimuel at zfcampus/zf-apigility-admin#245

@michalbundyra michalbundyra added the Enhancement New feature or request label Jan 10, 2020
@michalbundyra
Copy link
Member Author

👍 I like the extended idea because looking at a list of my resources I'll probably know what I'm looking for before I'd need to break them down by connected type. And while you're at it will you include doctrine-connected ?


Originally posted by @TomHAnderson at zfcampus/zf-apigility-admin#245 (comment)

@michalbundyra
Copy link
Member Author

@TomHAnderson the idea is to split the rest family with all connected type, including doctrine of course.


Originally posted by @ezimuel at zfcampus/zf-apigility-admin#245 (comment)

@michalbundyra
Copy link
Member Author

And I'm actually working on it :)


Originally posted by @jguittard at zfcampus/zf-apigility-admin#245 (comment)

@michalbundyra
Copy link
Member Author

@ezimuel Why don't you detail the payload you want returned, and then we can figure out how to make it happen. :)


Originally posted by @weierophinney at zfcampus/zf-apigility-admin#245 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant