Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of Executor is not general enough #3150

Open
KunoiSayami opened this issue Mar 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Implementation of Executor is not general enough #3150

KunoiSayami opened this issue Mar 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@KunoiSayami
Copy link

Bug Description

When try use execute() function in raw_sql , it cause this. But execute_many() is OK.

This error only shown in tokio::spawn(), if remove tokio::spawn(), error disappear.

error: implementation of `Executor` is not general enough
  --> src/main.rs:9:13
   |
9  | /             tokio::spawn(async {
10 | |                 let mut db = SqliteConnection::connect(":memory:").await.unwrap();
11 | |                 sqlx::raw_sql("").execute(&mut db).await.unwrap();
12 | |                 db.close().await.unwrap();
13 | |             })
   | |______________^ implementation of `Executor` is not general enough
   |
   = note: `Executor<'_>` would have to be implemented for the type `&mut SqliteConnection`
   = note: ...but `Executor<'0>` is actually implemented for the type `&'0 mut SqliteConnection`, for some specific lifetime `'0`

Minimal Reproduction

use sqlx::{Connection, SqliteConnection};

fn main() {
    tokio::runtime::Builder::new_multi_thread()
        .enable_all()
        .build()
        .unwrap()
        .block_on(async {
            tokio::spawn(async {
                let mut db = SqliteConnection::connect(":memory:").await.unwrap();
                sqlx::raw_sql("").execute(&mut db).await.unwrap();
                db.close().await.unwrap();
            })
        });
}

Info

  • SQLx version: v0.8.0-alpha.0
  • SQLx features enabled: ["sqlite", "runtime-tokio"]
  • Database server and version: SQLite 3.45.2
  • Operating system: Arch linux
  • rustc --version: rustc 1.77.0 (aedd173a2 2024-03-17)
@bionicles
Copy link

bionicles commented Mar 29, 2024

I must admit I'm also struggling with Executor for several hours today. For some reason, attempts to make a function generic over DB: Database lead to repeated suggestions to add deeply nested trait bounds to tell rustc things which are definitely true are indeed true, and even adding the bounds didn't work to satisfy this "execute" function.

error[E0277]: the trait bound for<'c> &'c mut <DB as sqlx::Database>::Connection: sqlx::Executor<'c> is not satisfied
--> src/lib.rs:244:47
|
244 | match sqlx::query(&sql_statement).execute(command.pool).await {
| ------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait for<'c> sqlx::Executor<'c> is not implemented for &'c mut <DB as sqlx::Database>::Connection, which is required by &sqlx::Pool<DB>: sqlx::Executor<'_>
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for &sqlx::Pool<DB> to implement sqlx::Executor<'_>
note: required by a bound in sqlx::query::Query::<'q, DB, A>::execute
--> /home/bion/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/sqlx-core-0.7.4/src/query.rs:155:12
|
151 | pub async fn execute<'e, 'c: 'e, E>(self, executor: E) -> Result<DB::QueryResult, Error>
| ------- required by a bound in this associated function
...
155 | E: Executor<'c, Database = DB>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in Query::<'q, DB, A>::execute
help: consider introducing a where clause, but there might be an alternative better way to express this requirement
|
192 | ) -> Result<InsertReceipt, DFUtilError> where for<'c> &'c mut ::Connection: sqlx::Executor<'c> {
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Likewise with arguments,

error[E0599]: the method fetch_all exists for struct Query<'_, DB, <DB as HasArguments<'_>>::Arguments>, but its trait bounds were not satisfied
--> src/lib.rs:134:40
|
134 | let query_result = match sql_query.fetch_all(pool_ref_for_db).await {
| ^^^^^^^^^ method cannot be called on Query<'_, DB, <DB as HasArguments<'_>>::Arguments> due to unsatisfied trait bounds
|
= note: the following trait bounds were not satisfied:
<DB as sqlx::database::HasArguments<'_>>::Arguments: sqlx::IntoArguments<'_, DB>

and with Types, make sure they're both Type and Encode! :
error[E0277]: the trait bound i16: sqlx::Encode<'_, DB> is not satisfied
--> src/lib.rs:103:51
|
103 | AnyValue::UInt8(v) => b.push_bind(v as i16),
| --------- ^^^^^^^^ the trait sqlx::Encode<'_, DB> is not implemented for i16
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
note: required by a bound in sqlx::query_builder::Separated::<'qb, 'args, DB, Sep>::push_bind
--> /home/bion/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/sqlx-core-0.7.4/src/query_builder.rs:572:20
|
570 | pub fn push_bind(&mut self, value: T) -> &mut Self
| --------- required by a bound in this associated function
571 | where
572 | T: 'args + Encode<'args, DB> + Send + Type,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in Separated::<'qb, 'args, DB, Sep>::push_bind
help: consider extending the where clause, but there might be an alternative better way to express this requirement
|
29 | &'a Pool: sqlx::Executor<'a, Database = DB>, i16: sqlx::Encode<'_, DB>
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

error[E0277]: the trait bound bool: sqlx::Type<DB> is not satisfied
--> src/lib.rs:102:53
|
102 | AnyValue::Boolean(v) => b.push_bind(v),
| --------- ^ the trait sqlx::Type<DB> is not implemented for bool
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
note: required by a bound in sqlx::query_builder::Separated::<'qb, 'args, DB, Sep>::push_bind
--> /home/bion/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/sqlx-core-0.7.4/src/query_builder.rs:572:47
|
570 | pub fn push_bind(&mut self, value: T) -> &mut Self
| --------- required by a bound in this associated function
571 | where
572 | T: 'args + Encode<'args, DB> + Send + Type,
| ^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in Separated::<'qb, 'args, DB, Sep>::push_bind
help: consider extending the where clause, but there might be an alternative better way to express this requirement
|
29 | &'a Pool: sqlx::Executor<'a, Database = DB>, bool: sqlx::Type
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I really like the concept of sqlx but every time I try to use it, it turns into a nightmare. What's up with that?

async fn bulk_existence_check<'a, DB: Database>(
    query: BulkExistenceCheck<'a, DB>,
) -> Result<BulkExistenceReceipt<'a>, DFUtilError>
where
    &'a Pool<DB>: sqlx::Executor<'a, Database = DB>

I guess I figured Database would be "enough" for Pool to execute commands and for number types to know how to go into sql. Seems like I need to add a bound for every Type of thing and specify that yes, you can Encode them for this Database, and make sure the Pool and the PoolConnection Connection are all Executor, and don't forget that the Arguments in HasArguments need to implement IntoArguments ?

Ugh. How do we make this simpler, please? Is Database just a marker and I'm using the wrong generic here? I'd love to just hardcode everything for Postgres but I can't because I need to support MySQL. And SQLite is also a Database so I had hoped to abstract over all of them. Is that a pipe dream?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants