Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[build] publish stripped nighthawk binaries #185

Open
DelusionalOptimist opened this issue Sep 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[build] publish stripped nighthawk binaries #185

DelusionalOptimist opened this issue Sep 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
area/ci Continuous integration | Build and release area/performance Performance management help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@DelusionalOptimist
Copy link
Contributor

It is a bit of a guess, but over at envoyproxy/nighthawk there's https://github.com/envoyproxy/nighthawk/blob/main/.bazelrc and https://github.com/envoyproxy/nighthawk/blob/main/.bazelversion.
Is there an equivalent of those being used for building the binaries that get published here?

Originally posted by @oschaaf in #179 (comment)
@DelusionalOptimist DelusionalOptimist self-assigned this Sep 25, 2021
@DelusionalOptimist DelusionalOptimist added area/ci Continuous integration | Build and release area/performance Performance management labels Sep 25, 2021
@DelusionalOptimist DelusionalOptimist mentioned this issue Sep 25, 2021
Merged
1 task
@leecalcote leecalcote added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 15, 2022
@pottekkat
Copy link
Contributor

This is still a requirement right? Publishing Nighthawk binaries as assets with each release.

Or are we just going to be publishing the Docker image?

// @gyohuangxin

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/ci Continuous integration | Build and release area/performance Performance management help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@leecalcote @pottekkat @DelusionalOptimist