We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With Ruby 3.1 landing in Fedora, there appears to be one test failure in Coveralls:
$ rspec -Ilib --tag '~if' spec ... snip ... ......... An error occurred in an `after(:context)` hook. Failure/Error: SimpleCov.start do add_filter do |source_file| source_file.filename =~ /spec/ && !(source_file.filename =~ /fixture/) end end RuntimeError: coverage measurement is already setup # /usr/share/gems/gems/simplecov-0.13.0/lib/simplecov.rb:48:in `start' # /usr/share/gems/gems/simplecov-0.13.0/lib/simplecov.rb:48:in `start' # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:21:in `setup_formatter' # ./spec/coveralls/coveralls_spec.rb:104:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' ............... Finished in 0.32023 seconds (files took 0.93759 seconds to load) 44 examples, 0 failures, 1 error occurred outside of examples
While I we have quite old version of Coveralls, checking the upstream repository, coveralls_spec.rb neither spec_helper.rb were modified recently.
coveralls_spec.rb
spec_helper.rb
However, checking Ruby, there is one change in Ruby 3.1 which seems to be related:
ruby/ruby@86e3d77
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
have you tried switching to https://github.com/tagliala/coveralls-ruby-reborn ?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
With Ruby 3.1 landing in Fedora, there appears to be one test failure in Coveralls:
While I we have quite old version of Coveralls, checking the upstream repository,
coveralls_spec.rb
neitherspec_helper.rb
were modified recently.However, checking Ruby, there is one change in Ruby 3.1 which seems to be related:
ruby/ruby@86e3d77
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: