Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for XER and JER? #109

Open
ERnsTL opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Support for XER and JER? #109

ERnsTL opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
area/codec Related to a new or existing ASN.1 codec. kind/enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ERnsTL
Copy link

ERnsTL commented Nov 1, 2022

  • in addition to the binary formats, support for the text-based XML rules and JSON encoding rules would be great in order to use this library for web apps
  • true power of ASN1 is the many rulesets -> add XER and JER?

Is this planned?

@XAMPPRocky
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your issue! Yes, I would definitely like to support this, first I need to complete my PER implementation, and then I intend to focus on adding text based encoding rules like JER and XER.

@ERnsTL ERnsTL changed the title Support for XER? Support for XER and JER? Nov 1, 2022
@ERnsTL
Copy link
Author

ERnsTL commented Nov 1, 2022

@XAMPPRocky Thanks for your positive response - you took the words out of my mouth, was to ask about JER as well.

That is a great outlook! JER and XER can be great bridges between more conservative ASN1 systems using binary ASN1 rulesets and "hip" JSON-based apps / APIs and web apps / frontends.

Cool, and have a great day!

@XAMPPRocky XAMPPRocky added kind/enhancement New feature or request area/codec Related to a new or existing ASN.1 codec. labels Dec 12, 2022
@6d7a 6d7a mentioned this issue Oct 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/codec Related to a new or existing ASN.1 codec. kind/enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants