Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On mobile web, performing the best movements does not solve -Fork Challenge #5 Q- exercise #15289

Closed
DSagaz opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@DSagaz
Copy link

DSagaz commented May 12, 2024

Exact URL of where the bug happened

https://lichess.org/practice/basic-tactics/the-fork/Qj281y1p/xXlzEw3i

Steps to reproduce the bug

Making the best moves

  1. Qe6
  2. Qc6
  3. Qxb7

What did you expect to happen?

I hope to get the message: "Success! Go to next exercise"

What happened instead?

I got the message: "Get a winnig position in 3 moves Click to retry"

Operating system

Android 11

Browser and version (or alternate access method)

Yandex Browser 24.4.4

Additional information

IMG_20240511_192856
More than 15 times I have tried to solve the exercise, but the error always happens.
No need to log in to reproduce the error.

@DSagaz DSagaz added the bug label May 12, 2024
@TBestLittleHelper
Copy link
Contributor

TBestLittleHelper commented May 12, 2024

I have adjusted the target CP value down from -700 to -400. It's generally a won position, so many moves will work. I do think that if you played the intended Qe6 Qxh3 Rxb7, you might be closer to the intended -700cp in the final position. But seemed best to lower the target as unlucky evals can probably fail even in that case.

It's basically the same issue as https://lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/interference-practice-problems-coded-incorrectly#3

@DSagaz
Copy link
Author

DSagaz commented May 12, 2024

I have adjusted the target CP value down from -700 to -400. It's generally a won position, so many moves will work. I do think that if you played the intended Qe6 Qxh3 Rxb7, you might be closer to the intended -700cp in the final position. But seemed best to lower the target as unlucky evals can probably fail even in that case.

It's basically the same issue as https://lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/interference-practice-problems-coded-incorrectly#3

Thanks for the adjustment. The moves I performed are the best according to Get a hint --> See best move. You could adjust the hints according to the amount of advantage expected.

@DSagaz DSagaz closed this as completed May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants