You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the keyspace is defined once and for all in the ORM initial configuration.
Sometimes, in order to accommodate with different workloads, some data must be treated differently from some other, requiring its storage in different keyspaces.
One example of such cases would be logs requiring lower replication than live data, or a replication in a datacenter running data analytics.
Although it is obviously possible today to create two ORM instances to accommodate these different keyspaces, it is unpractical and is less and less as the number of keyspaces grows.
Would it be possible to add a keyspace option in the schema configuration, allowing to override the keyspace on a per-table basis?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the keyspace is defined once and for all in the ORM initial configuration.
Sometimes, in order to accommodate with different workloads, some data must be treated differently from some other, requiring its storage in different keyspaces.
One example of such cases would be logs requiring lower replication than live data, or a replication in a datacenter running data analytics.
Although it is obviously possible today to create two ORM instances to accommodate these different keyspaces, it is unpractical and is less and less as the number of keyspaces grows.
Would it be possible to add a
keyspace
option in the schema configuration, allowing to override the keyspace on a per-table basis?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: