Add CLI

[remcohaszing]

Initial checklist

• I read the support docs
• I read the contributing guide
• I agree to follow the code of conduct
• I searched issues and couldn’t find anything (or linked relevant results below)

Problem

In addition to type safety in editors, it would be nice if this can be validated in CI, similar to tsc.

Solution

Create a new package, @mdx-js/cli.

Some potential features of the CLI are:

• Type checking
• Emitting .d.ts and .js files for TypeScript, JavaScript, JSX, and MDX
• Linting MDX using remark plugins similar to unified-engine

Alternatives

The idea is pretty vague still. There are many potential additional features and alternatives.

[wooorm]

this

What does this refer to?

---

Solution: you list several ideas. Which are most important?

Emitting .d.ts and .js files for TypeScript, JavaScript, JSX, and MDX

Why should this CLI also do things that TS does for .ts files? .js and .jsx files?

[remcohaszing]

this

What does this refer to?

type safety

Solution: you list several ideas. Which are most important?

Type checking to begin with. I think most people use MDX with a framework to build a website. For such cases emitting files is not really important, that would be mostly for libraries.

Emitting .d.ts and .js files for TypeScript, JavaScript, JSX, and MDX

Why should this CLI also do things that TS does for .ts files? .js and .jsx files?

The language service already needs all of these files to get a full context of the project. I don’t think it will take any extra effort to emit the JavaScript files. In fact, flags that clean the output directory might get in the way when using both tsc and the MDX CLI.

[adueck]

YES!! This is a dream come true to see these discussions happening. I have a project with a bunch of .mdx files with complex data imports etc, and for a long time I have wished there was a pipeline for type checking these files. This kind of thing will let mdx fly as a first class citizen in the growing world of TypeScript development! 🚀

[ChristianMurphy]

Potentially related to #298, Volar is working on a Scripts API:

The Scripts API is designed to expose the formatting and linting capabilities of the language server so that they can be used in scripts, allowing you to use it in CI or git pre-commit hooks and get the same results as you would in an IDE.

https://blog.vuejs.org/posts/volar-a-new-beginning.html

[wooorm]

For such cases emitting files is not really important, that would be mostly for libraries.

Do you know of an example of a library that has several MDX files that it exposes?

Type checking to begin with.

Couldn’t TypeScript perform type checking? What’s the reason a different program is needed to do that?

I don’t think it will take any extra effort to emit the JavaScript files. In fact, flags that clean the output directory might get in the way when using both tsc and the MDX CLI.

Maybe it isn’t a lot of work to implement your ideas, but I would also like to hear a benefit for why code should exists?
As you mention: two tools doing the same, will cause conflicts.

Create a new package, @mdx-js/cli.

Some potential features of the CLI are:

What is the reason for one CLI (@mdx-js/cli) to exist for varying needs, instead of a CLI that specifically focussed on the primary problem at hand, the types(cript) part? @mdx-js/tsc or so? @mdx-js/analyzer?

[remcohaszing]

For such cases emitting files is not really important, that would be mostly for libraries.

Do you know of an example of a library that has several MDX files that it exposes?

No.

Type checking to begin with.

Couldn’t TypeScript perform type checking? What’s the reason a different program is needed to do that?

TypeScript can’t handle MDX, not for editor features, nor type checking.

I don’t think it will take any extra effort to emit the JavaScript files. In fact, flags that clean the output directory might get in the way when using both tsc and the MDX CLI.

Maybe it isn’t a lot of work to implement your ideas, but I would also like to hear a benefit for why code should exists? As you mention: two tools doing the same, will cause conflicts.

I don’t consider this doing two things. Type checking and emitting both fall in the category of making a CLI like tsc that understands MDX.

Create a new package, @mdx-js/cli.
Some potential features of the CLI are:

What is the reason for one CLI (@mdx-js/cli) to exist for varying needs, instead of a CLI that specifically focussed on the primary problem at hand, the types(cript) part? @mdx-js/tsc or so? @mdx-js/analyzer?

I consider the first two points to be more or less the same thing, with slightly different options.

The last point is more interesting. Currently we have MDX and remark-cli / remark-language-server. Both are powerful and use the same underlying technology. Combining them should be straight-forward. I have no strong opinion on what this should look like, but it’s probably one of:

• Create one MDX CLI with unified-engine support and type checking support.
• Add MDX support to remark-cli.
• Create another CLI and language server for MDX based on unified-engine.

---

I think this issue will become redundant and we should hook into Volar at some point to get all their TypeScript related features, including a CLI, without having to maintain this separately.

[wooorm]

TypeScript can’t handle MDX, not for editor features, nor type checking.

I don’t think I understand you at all, because as far as I understand, TypeScript can check types if someone authors types.

You yourself have documented that it works: https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/b92231c3ef87e84860ea674ec38d8e694e5dc64e/types/mdx/index.d.ts#L47-L53.