Low Lighthouse score of Meshery.io #973
Comments
|
Thanks for opening this issue. A contributor will be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please review the Meshery Contributors' Welcome Guide and sure to join the community Slack. |
Udit-takkar
added
the
kind/epic
|
Hey @Udit-takkar, do you have any suggestions on how we can improve it |
|
@Yashsharma1911 will have to test a lot of things with lighthouse report and use some concepts learned from here layer5io/layer5#3572 (comment). Some things like lazy loading below the fold images, using images of webp quality, properly loading the third party code, preloading fonts ... etc. |
|
Hey, @Udit-takkar are you still working on this? |
|
@Yashsharma1911 yeah will start after 17 when my exams end |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
stale
bot
added
the
issue/stale
Udit-takkar
removed
the
issue/stale
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
stale
bot
added
the
issue/stale
Udit-takkar
removed
the
issue/stale
|
Hey @Yashsharma1911 , I have some ideas on how to make it better by reducing render blocking time. Can I work on this issue? |
|
@saisuvanth yeah go ahead |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
stale
bot
added
the
issue/stale
vishalvivekm
removed
the
issue/stale
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
stale
bot
added
the
issue/stale
stale
bot
removed
the
issue/stale
|
@Udit-takkar are you still working on this issue? |
|
Reanalyzed the assessments; improvements have been made. |
|
Is it possible to increase the performance more? |
|
@Savio629, yes, it can be, check the recommendations in the Opportunities section of the results |
|
Hello, I would like to give this one a try! |
|
Please go ahead, also try sharing your progress as you go so that others can help you if needed ^^ |
|
Hey, Just dropping the update on this. Changed the .gif files to .webp format.( I tried webm and mpeg4 as it suggested but they were not working so I used webp instead) This is the before and after change : Before
After (best practice is low because of using local host instead of https)
Should I start a draft PR, or make a PR after making considerable changes? @Yashsharma1911 |
|
Hey this is good 👏, yes please raise a draft PR so that others can provide a review as you go. |
|
Hi does this issue still needs to be addressed ? I ran a lighthouse test and the performance metric is currently at 53. I'd like to give this a go and target to touch 80-ish. |
|
Hey yes this is still an area for help, and target sounds good too, you can work on it, also as you go and explore ways to increase lighthouse score I'll suggest to create draft PR so that maintainers can provide you feedback along the way |
|
Hi @Yashsharma1911 I tried a bunch of stuff like deferring scripts, preloading CSS, and even tested out WebP format for assets but still no significant improvements in performance. I'll try to work on some other issue now. I hope that I didn't waste your time here. thanks! |
Description
meshery.io is failing the Core Web Vitals Assessment
Mobile performance score is between 20-40
Check here:- https://pagespeed.web.dev/report?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmeshery.io%2F&form_factor=mobile
Expected Behavior
The landing page should pass the Core Web Vitals Assessment
Screenshots
Enviroment:
Contributor Guides and Handbook
The meshery.io website uses Jekyll and GitHub Pages. Site content is found under the
masterbranch.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: