Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Modifying Sliced Documents #419

Closed
xuzeyu91 opened this issue Apr 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

[Feature Request] Modifying Sliced Documents #419

xuzeyu91 opened this issue Apr 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@xuzeyu91
Copy link

Context / Scenario

I hope to add modifications to the sliced document after Import. I have encapsulated the Handle implementation of QA slicing based on step.

The problem

For example, the following are my prompt words:

I will give you a paragraph of text, study them, and organize the learning results. The requirements are:
1. Ask up to 25 questions.
2. Provide answers to each question.
3. The answer should be detailed and complete, and can include markup elements such as regular text, links, codes, tables, announcements, media links, etc.
4. Return multiple questions and answers in format:
Q1: Question.
A1: Answer.
Q2:
A2:
My text: "" {$input}} ""

In this case, after importing the document, I may need to manually modify the QA extracted by llm. I hope this can be implemented from Kernel Memory because it is compatible with multiple different vector databases

Proposed solution

Add the ability to modify and re vector sliced documents in MemoryServerless

Importance

would be great to have

@xuzeyu91 xuzeyu91 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 20, 2024
@microsoft microsoft locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 5, 2024
@dluc dluc converted this issue into discussion #620 Jun 5, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant