This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
[Question] does content.url in filename for websites make sense? (I want attribution per paragraph via separate prompt) #491
Labels
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Context / Scenario
I changed the prompt to make sure the llm includes the source per paragraph of the answer. So I can more closly align the response with the facts for my users. When I do that, I can only tell it to reference the filename (as this is what the llm gets in the facts part of the prompt). For websites this is always "content.url" - because this is set so in
kernel-memory/service/Core/MemoryService.cs
Line 120 in a1f280c
Question
I wonder if it would not make more sense to put the url there instead of a static string. Or at least include the url in the facts where it exists.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: