New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

improve ignoreMismatch() #474

Open

unional opened this issue Feb 12, 2023 · 0 comments

Projects

Collaborator

unional commented Feb 12, 2023

currently numeric and string value have different behavior.
Need to think and see how to make them consistent.

The problem is that returning recorded value will break tests as the inert value have changed so the test is expecting the new input value.

But if there is no input value, or the result is computed using the input value, there is no way to produce that.

Need to do something like the maskValue() function so that user can control what to return.

unional created this issue from a note in 8.0 (To do)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment