Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support output feed as input #475

Open
unional opened this issue Feb 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Support output feed as input #475

unional opened this issue Feb 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Projects

Comments

@unional
Copy link
Collaborator

unional commented Feb 12, 2023

This requires a different way to manage the values.
It will be scoped based:

  • when no scope present, the action must be performed by user
  • when executing an action, any additional action must be performed by mockto
  • any value returned to the user, the performer can be user or mockto (as we have a reference to it before returns)
  • any value never returned to the user, the performer can only be mockto
  • when in doubt, we can assume the call is made by user, and if it does not take place for n msec, mockto will invoke it.
  • when in doubt, we can analyze the subsequence/in-between call to determine if it is made by user or mockto
@unional unional created this issue from a note in 8.0 (To do) Feb 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
8.0
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant