You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Cinder combines multiple abuse reports into a single job - i.e. if a job is already open for an entity (an addon, a rating, a collection, or a user) then rather than opening a new job, the report is attached to the existing job. We handle this fine. But we made an assumption that appeal jobs - where a previous decision was appealed by the reporter or the owner of the entity - were separate.
This assumption may not be correct. QA testing (#1728) has shown that reporting an entity that has an outstanding appeal job also combines that that report into the job.
Acceptance Criteria
We need to make any necessary model changes to support the scenario of abuse reports being associated with an appeal job
This also applies to appeal-appeal jobs (reporter-reports->decision:approve; reporter-appeals->decision:reject; owner-appeals)
appeals on those decisions need to be tested (e.g. do we allow enough time?)
Checks
If the issue is ready to work on, I have removed the "needs:info" label.
Description
Cinder combines multiple abuse reports into a single job - i.e. if a job is already open for an entity (an addon, a rating, a collection, or a user) then rather than opening a new job, the report is attached to the existing job. We handle this fine. But we made an assumption that appeal jobs - where a previous decision was appealed by the reporter or the owner of the entity - were separate.
This assumption may not be correct. QA testing (#1728) has shown that reporting an entity that has an outstanding appeal job also combines that that report into the job.
Acceptance Criteria
Checks
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: