This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 4, 2022. It is now read-only.
Should Burnham use the client activity API? #148
Labels
application
Tasks related to the application component
capability
New capability for burnham or burnham-bigquery
discussion
Issues for discussing ideas for features
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Glean now provides the client activity API.
It is not yet implemented for Python.
This allows embedding applications to trigger behavior based on client activity.
On mobile this maps to foregrounding (active) and backgrounding (inactive).
For Desktop this maps to certain activity within a certain amount of time.
The API triggers the baseline and events ping, both otherwise internal pings.
Describe the solution you'd like
Would it be useful for burnham to use this API to simulate activity and thus test Glean's expected behavior around those pings?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: