Switch to ESM only

[yandeu]

Make nanojsx esm only and drop cjs completely.

[jrson83]

Hey @yandeu, I tried setting up a project with SSR and "type": "module" inside package.json.

To reduce entry point size, I'd like to import every export from nano-jsx/lib/<component> instead of importing everything from nano-jsx. I changed every import from lib to esm folder for testing, but now the commonjs server files also use the esm files with require so it naturally throws [ERR_REQUIRE_ESM]: require() of ES Module server\assets\index.page.ab0d9bb1.js not supported.

I thought when pointing to nano-jsx it would maybe load from esm automatically for client, but it still loads from nano-jsx/lib/index.

Is it actually possible to already use the esm bundle in the current state of development with SSR?

[yandeu]

It is ready.

But I believe Webpack can't bundle Node.js modules yet. So you can't use it Isomorphic. At least I failed setting it up.

To use it on the server you can use the node12 option of the ts compiler (typescript@next).

[jrson83]

Oki, I didn't use Webpack, I used Vite with vite-plugin-ssr which is using ESBuild to compile Typescript. I gonna read the docs again and see if I can get it working.

[yandeu]

I finally got a working example :)
https://github.com/nanojsx/nano-jsx-esm-example

[jrson83]

I finally got a working example :)
https://github.com/nanojsx/nano-jsx-esm-example

Nice, thanks. I also tried but couldn't get it working.

Will you remove cjs support in the future?

[yandeu]

In the future, I will make esm the default. But I will still ship both.

[fusionstrings]

I finally got a working example :)

https://github.com/nanojsx/nano-jsx-esm-example

Is this something we may use already?

[yandeu]

Is this something we may use already?

Yes