About locked wallet and wallet account changed

[99sudarshan]

1. How to catch event and logout the user if wallet account switched in our code?
2. After unlocked the wallet its still catch error "wallet is locked" unless refresh the page, how to solve it ?

[amirsaran3]

Hey @99sudarshan ,

1. https://github.com/near/wallet-selector/blob/main/packages/core/docs/api/selector.md#onevent-callback Here you can find more info about events. You can listen to the accountsChanged event.
2. Which wallet has this issue? Can you post more info about this. This maybe a problem with the wallet not wallet-selector.

[99sudarshan]

1. When account changed: Event triggering is not persistent for on('accountsChanged', ......)

I have implemented like this when changing the account from wallet in my walletSelectorContext.ts but its didn't trigger on account changed even not rendered walletSelectorContext.ts whether its just logged from wallet selector maybe store.ts or sender.ts

const subscription = selector?.on('accountsChanged', ({ walletId,accounts }) => {
console.log(account changed ${walletId})
})

return ()=>subscription?.remove()
}, [selector]) 

[99sudarshan]

2. When wallet is locked: Detect and request wallet unlock .

I am facing this from sender wallet. when i unlocked the wallet its still catch error "wallet is locked" and I have implemented it like this and also dispatching some state statically to reload the page when user unlocked the wallet.

const handleConnectWallet: () => void = async () => {
try {
if (selector.isSignedIn()) {
const wallet = await selector.wallet()
// console.log("wallet",wallet)
// console.log("selector",selector)
const owner = await wallet.verifyOwner({
message: "Authorize this wallet to access your account"
})
if (owner) {
const response = await login(owner)
if (response?.status === 200) {
dispatch(changeSignState(true))
}
}
} else {
modal.show()
}
} catch (error) {
console.log(error)
dispatch(
toast.error({
message: t("unlock-wallet") || ""
})
)
dispatch(changeSignState(false))
setReload(true)
}
}

[amirsaran3]

Continued discussion here #626