Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The maturity RFC has no maturity period information and it does not cover header dep maturity, we have to check the code #168

Open
doitian opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
p:should-have Priority: important but not necessary for delivery in the current delivery timebox t:rfc Type: Create RFC

Comments

@doitian
Copy link
Member

doitian commented Jan 6, 2020

so still no RFC on maturity period, we have to check the code

Originally posted by @louzhixian in #56 (comment)

@doitian doitian added this to 📬 Needs triage in CKB - Issues Jan 6, 2020
@doitian doitian moved this from ⚙️Chores to 📬 Needs triage in CKB - Issues Jan 8, 2020
@doitian doitian moved this from 📬 Needs triage to ⚙️Chores in CKB - Issues Jan 8, 2020
@doitian doitian added this to 🔙 Backlog in CKB - Issues Jan 13, 2020
@doitian doitian added t:rfc Type: Create RFC p:should-have Priority: important but not necessary for delivery in the current delivery timebox labels Jan 13, 2020
@doitian doitian removed this from 🔙 Backlog in CKB - Issues Jul 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p:should-have Priority: important but not necessary for delivery in the current delivery timebox t:rfc Type: Create RFC
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant