Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: validate keys and store names #80

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

eduardoboucas
Copy link
Member

Which problem is this pull request solving?

Stops URL-encoding keys and adds a new set of validation rules for both blob keys and store names.

Related to https://github.com/netlify/pillar-runtime/issues/763.

Closes https://github.com/netlify/pillar-runtime/issues/760.

BREAKING CHANGE: Stores and keys are no longer URL-encoded and must follow a new set of naming rules
@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2023 13:11
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 23, 2023

Deploy Preview for blobs-js ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8274948
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/blobs-js/deploys/6536bc2a0a7f0500099f4c8c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-80--blobs-js.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality label Oct 23, 2023
@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas merged commit af867f8 into main Oct 24, 2023
@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas deleted the feat/validate-keys branch October 24, 2023 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants