Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: reorder objective validation rules to produce more adequate composite objective validation messages [PC-12021] #339

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

nikodemrafalski
Copy link
Contributor

Validating if there's more than one composite objective in SLO should take precedence over objective uniqueness validation

@nikodemrafalski nikodemrafalski force-pushed the PC-12021-composite-objectives-validation branch from 8b840e4 to 2787f54 Compare March 25, 2024 15:23
@nikodemrafalski nikodemrafalski force-pushed the PC-12021-composite-objectives-validation branch from 13f6616 to 40ea8bf Compare March 28, 2024 15:34
@nikodemrafalski nikodemrafalski force-pushed the PC-12021-composite-objectives-validation branch from e8684cb to 3e9d49f Compare April 2, 2024 09:44
@nikodemrafalski nikodemrafalski enabled auto-merge (squash) April 2, 2024 09:51
@nikodemrafalski nikodemrafalski merged commit ff5b58b into main Apr 2, 2024
5 checks passed
@nikodemrafalski nikodemrafalski deleted the PC-12021-composite-objectives-validation branch April 2, 2024 09:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working go patch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants